World Bank/IMF backed debt cancellation
Source: IFIs Latin American Monitor
The meeting of social organizations with Paul Wolfowitz, World Bank President, Rodrigo de Rato, IMF Managing Director and Trevor Manuel, Finance Minister and Development Committee Chair (World Bank) was only an update on the relationship of the World Bank with civil society representatives. September 26, 2005. [see more]
Imprimir   Enviar    Correct 
Source: IPS

Washington, 25 September 2005.

The World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) have agreed that the debts owed by 18 of world's poorest countries to them and to the African Development Bank will be cancelled "outright" and "upfront", bringing an end to the suspense surrounding the issue for nearly three months.

The Group of Eight (G8) most industrialised countries had proposed complete debt cancellation without conditions for these countries. The deal was left to be approved by the Bank and IMF during their annual meetings, which concluded Sunday. Both institutions have agreed to cancel the debts.

The countries whose debt will be erased are Benin, Bolivia, Burkina Faso, Ethiopia, Ghana, Guyana, Honduras, Madagascar, Mali, Mauritania, Mozambique, Nicaragua, Niger, Rwanda, Senegal, Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia.

It is important to note that all these countries are among the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC), a category established by the Bank and IMF in 1996. HIPC created a process of debt relief for extremely poor countries, which have to meet highly controversial conditions to qualify, such as large-scale privatisation of utilities like water and other state-owned enterprises, removal of subsidies on basic goods, and trade liberalisation, set by the two institutions.

As such, all the 18 countries in question have already fulfilled the IMF and World Bank conditions.

HIPC conditions have come under fire from civil society organisations, and even the Bank and IMF have admitted that these conditions have not succeeded in their aim "to reduce to sustainable levels the external debt burdens of the most heavily indebted poor countries" and "freeing up of resources for increased social sector expenditures". Some activists had been sceptical of the debt deal from the start, saying that the institutions may add extra conditions, making the deal meaningless. They had pressured the institutions to agree to full debt cancellation without conditions and to extend the deal to other poor countries.

Asked by IPS if there will be any more conditions for the eligible countries before they can be granted full debt relief, Rodrigo de Rato, the IMF's managing director, said that there will be no more conditions and that the debt cancellation will be given "outright" and "upfront".

He was speaking at a joint Bank and IMF Development Committee press conference today. Also in attendance were Paul Wolfowitz, president of the World Bank, and Minister Trevor Manuel, chairman of the Development Committee.

De Rato added that the results of the deal will be reviewed by the International Monetary and Financial Committee (IMFC).

The issue at the heart of the debt cancellation deliberations at the Bank and IMF since the G8 proposed it has been the financing of the International Development Association (IDA), the World Bank agency that gives around nine billion dollars a year in concessional loans to poor countries. Doubts have been raised by donor countries about the sustainability of the IDA if the debt is cancelled.

Today, the Development Committee announced that it had "agreed on the need for an interdependent package consisting especially of dollar for dollar compensation for IDA that is truly additional to existing commitments and that maintains the financial integrity and capacity of IDA to assist poor countries in the futureà"

"We are confident that the package, including financing, the main technical features of the proposal and burden sharing on a voluntary basis will provide these benefits," the committee said.

Seventy percent of the funding for the IDA comes from the G8 countries -- Russia, Britain, France, Germany, the United States, Japan, Italy and Canada. Wolfowitz stressed Sunday that in order for the deal to succeed, the donor countries must fulfill their promises.

The Bank and IMF also "emphasised the importance of maintaining sound economic performance and good governance by eligible countries".

Wolfowitz assured reporters that the details of the deal will be finalised in the next three weeks.

"We are still far from a final deal in practice, despite the principle of 100 percent cancellation endorsed today," he said. "Once donor countries will concede additional financing to pay for the deal, then in particular in the case of the World Bank, it should be clarified how this will impact aid disbursement to these 18 and to other countries which are not in the initiative."

Civil Society's responses

Antonio Tricarico, coordinator of Campaign to Reform the World Bank (CRBM) in Italy, told IPS, "The devil remains in the details and we will keep watching them."

The debt amount to be erased for the 18 eligible countries is about 40 billion dollars.

Neil Watkins, national coordinator of the Jubilee USA Network, an anti-debt group, told IPS, "complete debt cancellation for these countries is a welcome step. However, this cancellation amounts to only 10 percent of the money that is needed to achieve the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs)."

The MDGs include a 50 percent reduction in poverty and hunger; universal primary education; reduction of child mortality by two-thirds; cutbacks in maternal mortality by three-quarters; promotion of gender equality; reversal of the spread of HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases; and a North-South global partnership for development.

A summit meeting of 189 world leaders in September 2000 pledged to meet all of these goals by the year 2015. But their implementation has depended primarily on increased development aid by Western donors.

"This means that these 18 countries should only be the beginning," Watkins said. "The World Bank and IMF should extend debt cancellation to all poor countries if they are serious about poverty alleviation."

"Also, civil society must stay vigilant because the details of the deal will be worked out over the upcoming weeks at the IMF and World Bank boards. What we have right now is only a broad agreement; the finer details are what will matter."

Another important issue discussed at the IMF and World Bank meetings was climate change, which the Development Committee statement describes as "one of the greatest threats to the world today".

But critics charge that the World Bank has only exacerbated the problem.

"By being one of the leading global financiers of fossil fuel projects and ignoring the results of its own extractive industries review, the World Bank is one of the most guilty in fueling the world's unsustainable addiction to oil and other CO2-producing industries," Ann Petermann of the Global Justice Ecology Project told IPS.

"This statement does nothing to acknowledge the damage that the World Bank has done or even to take steps to address the issue, one of which would be implementing the recommendations of the extractive industries review."

World Bank/IMF Annual Meetings - September 2005
At the 2005 Annual Meetings, the Boards of Governors will decide on major international monetary issues. Civil society organizations are preparing seminars and workshops surrounding the Annual Meetings with special focus on conditionalities, debt, development financing and the Millennium Development Goals.

Imprimir print   Enviar send   correct 

In-depth reports
Detailed reports on key issues
Financing for Development
The Financing for Development process, led by the United Nations, reached a global 'consensus' in the Monterrey Conference (2002). But without political will that opportunity remains in jeopardy.
Although there is a wide array of perspectives on poverty at world level, no agreement has been reached about its character. In spite of having a common basis, there are multiple definitions and concepts on this issue.
The G8 Summit 2005
The Group of Eight (G8) Summit 2005 held in Gleneagles, Scotland from 6 to 8 July was aimed to focus on poverty in Africa and climate change but the leaders commitments fell far short of the expectations.
World Bank
The World Bank's main self-proclaimed objective is to eradicate poverty. Yet, evidence suggests that its programmes often harm the poor and the environment.
International Monetary Fund - IMF
The IMF is one of the most powerful international organizations. Its policies change the lives of millions of people in developing countries.
Economic, social and cultural rights - ESCR
ESC rights are valid, enforceable, justiciable and claimable under both local and international law. Civil society is campaigning for their full implementation.
Millennium Development Goals - MDGs
A comprehensive list of resources from the United Nations and civil society organizations.
Climate change
Climate change is widely considered to be one of the gravest threats to the sustainability of the planet's environment, the well-being of its people and the strength of its economies.

Official document

Development Committee Communiqué (World bank)

Communiqué of the Ministers and Governors of the Group of Ten

Communiqué of the International Monetary and Financial Committee of the Board of Governors of the International Monetary

Intergovernmental Group of Twenty-Four on International Monetary Affairs and Development Communiqué

Civil society views and analysis

Beyond HIPC - Debt cancellation and the Millennium Development Goals (Oxfam International)

Further work is needed on debt cancellation, InterAction claims (BIC USA)

Debt victory for some but billions left out (Christian Aid)

Oxfam reacts to World Bank and IMF debt relief announcement (Oxfam)

Next step on debt secured after frantic negotiations (Jubilee Debt Campaign)

Not quite time to count the chickens (EURODAD)

Action Aid responds to the World Bank Communiqué (Action Aid USA)

World Bank and IMF must cancel the debt (Jubilee USA)

Global Unions call on the IMF and World Bank to go beyond G8 agreement and drop harmful conditions on loans (ICFTU)

G8 debt deal – devil in the detail (World Development Movement)

GCAP reaction to IMF and World Bank announcement on debt cancellation (Global Call to Action Against Poverty (GCAP))

Articles by IFIs Latin American Monitor

Wolfowitz and CSOs (IFIs Latin American Monitor)

IMF Briefing on Latin America and the Caribbean (IFIs Latin American Monitor)

Wolfowitz calls for action to achieve specific results in the fight against poverty (IFIs Latin American Monitor)

Choike is a project of the Third World Institute | Contact | Avda. 18 de julio 2095/301, Montevideo 11200, Uruguay | Phone: +598 2403 1424