|
|
The “information society” originally springs up as a conceptual model that intends to account for the profound alterations experienced by industrial society in recent decades, mainly prompted by the technological revolution. Thus, the new informational model is usually regarded as the desired target being unfailingly approached by countries. However, the pace of transition to the information society depends to a large extent on the level of development and wealth of countries, taking into account the stock of knowledge, capacities and infrastructure needed to successfully complete such transition. Therefore, Southern countries fall once again behind the most developed ones, which have begun this transition from a more favourable starting point.
Within this context, the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) comes into existence as a global process that includes the participation of key actors in terms of information and communication issues, such as governments, the private sector and the academy. The Action Plan approved at the first phase of the Geneva Summit has been broadly criticized , mainly by civil society organizations. Among the items criticized there are organization topics (the multistakeholder approach proposed for the Summit’s organization was not taken into account to draw up such Plan) as well as political and ideological aspects. For example, the Geneva Action Plan is criticized for having a way too technical approach, giving priority to issues of access and extension of infrastructure rather than to policies for capacity building; it is also criticized for its lack of applicability when compared to the high diversity of situations registered worldwide. Likewise, it has been analysed that the type of public-private partnerships stipulated in the plan run the risk of minimizing state intervention and the set of public policies needed, thus exclusively promoting free-market based solutions which fail to ensure the achievement of the social development goals desired.
In spite of the above limitations with regards to specific results and notwithstanding the lack of visibility of the Summit if compared to other global instances, it has managed to introduce the issue of information society within national agendas. In this way, national strategies, cyber-strategies or e-strategies become action frameworks that support the construction of the information society in the different regions and countries. At global level, international institutions such as the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and the UN ICT Task Force have set precedents in terms of designing and promoting this type of strategies.
One of the outstanding factors related to the success of these strategies is the implementation of multistakeholder work frameworks in the design and application phases, so as to achieve wholesome perspectives based on the comparative views of all actors taking part in the process (including civil society and the private sector). The participation of the private sector in these processes is considered useful and necessary, provided it takes place under state supervision. The “let the private sector do it” policy usually and undesirably results in the extension of infrastructure and connection only to those market zones that are profitable. The information society action plans also have to deal with the liberalization of the telecommunication sector, imposed by international financial institutions in a large number of countries and regions, such as Latin America. The direct consequence of such reforms has been a decrease in regulations concerning the private sector’s actions, which results in the loss of connection between ICTs policies and human rights policies and the promotion of citizen practices.
The fact that the governments of less developed countries usually allocate very few resources for investment on this type of plans should be added to this complex situation. In view of reduced budgets, these plans are placed second with regards to priorities such as health and education. Likewise, most of these countries lack government technical teams trained in these issues, which results in fragmentary and short-rage policies and in the lack of participation in global decision-making instances, such as the WSIS. So, in terms of the design of policies, there is urgent need to consult and include those civil society organizations specialized in information and communication issues, which from their experience are capable of making valuable contributions to the process.
Action plans aimed at approaching the information society should be considered as state policies rather than as peripheral or accessory programmes. The current paradigm is aimed at wholesome programmes, coordinated at a multi-sectoral level and actively incorporated into development agendas, as being the most effective in the transition towards the information society. Emphasis should also be placed on joint regional efforts and regional strategies or plans.
Versión
en español
|
|
|
| |
 |
 |
News |
| Up-to-date current affairs information. |
Tue Aug 08 2006
E-government: An opportunity for citizen participation in the era of digital development
Mon May 08 2006
Engendering e-government in developing countries
|
 |
In-depth
reports |
| Detailed
reports on key issues |
Internet governance
The issue of a more democratic and equitable management of global Internet resources was one of the central issues in the UN World Summit on the Information Society.
Telecentres
Promoting digital inclusion, social equity and local development through mutual learning and exchange.
ICTD within the framework of the MDGs
Would MDGs be better achieved through ICTs? How do they fit into Southern development agendas?
World Summit on the Information Society - WSIS
An opportunity to build an equitable information society.
|
 |
NGOs |
| NGO web sites |
Global Knowledge Partnership (GKP)
Network of networks with a diverse membership base working globally on information and knowledge issues.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Global initiatives |
 |
|
Regional Action Plans - WSIS Tunis Phase |
 |
|
Regional programs |
 |
|
Some national experiences |
 |
|
Analysis and research |
 |
|
E-strategies in Latin America and the Caribbean |
 |
|
ICT policy and civil society |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|