a portal on Southern civil societies HOME ABOUT CONTACT ESPAÑOL Directory NGO sites This site Directory In-depth Reports Campaigns News Books Tools & Services Advanced search Wsis IFIs

In depth I  Access to knowledge WIPO: NGOs discuss the new development agenda Source: Electronic Frontier Foundation The first meeting of the new WIPO Committee on Development and Intellectual Property was held during the first week of March 2008 to formulate a work plan to put development in the mainstream focus of WIPO's operations and activities. This article includes a review of the meetings as well as notes provided by the ngos present. April 2008.[see more]         Correct  ADD YOUR COMMENT >> In an increasingly technology-driven world, the standard of protection provided by intellectual property (IP) rules is affecting development policies, human rights and other public-interest goals more than ever. Strict IP rules have had an adverse impact on the ability of many governments to fulfil their human rights obligations, of which obligations to ensure access to affordable medicines, educational goods and adequate food. This trend towards higher IP protection has been stimulated by the adoption of the World Trade Organization (WTO) Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement) in the 1990s, and the harmonization initiatives at the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). At WIPO, concerns about this trend prompted developing countries to put forward since 2004 a series of proposals in support of a WIPO Development Agenda. The proposals aim to ensure that international IP policy within WIPO takes into account development goals and is coherent with the international obligations of States, including obligations under human rights treaties. Human rights law and mechanisms can support this push for greater development coherence of the international IP regime, and accountability in IP decision-making. The TRIPS Agreement, which came into force in 1995, set minimum standards of IP protection which all members of the WTO have to implement. Despite international concerns about the impact of the TRIPS Agreement on development, IP standards worldwide continue to increase. These strict IP standards, known as "TRIPS-plus" standards, have emerged in investment agreements, trade agreements and in WIPO treaties. Moreover, the WIPO Secretariat has also been criticized for promoting TRIPS-plus standards at the expense of development concerns in its technical assistance and norm-setting activities. There have been particular concerns that WIPO’s technical assistance has too often failed to properly take into account the range of public policy goals relevant to IP policymaking in developing countries and tailor advice to respond to their particular economic, social and cultural development needs and circumstances. Mounting concern and criticism of WIPO’s activities by civil society, academics and developing countries provided impetus to a group of fourteen developing countries known as the "Group of Friends of Development" to submit a proposal to the WIPO General Assembly requesting the establishment of a new Development Agenda for WIPO. In October 2004 the Thirty-First WIPO General Assembly decided to convene inter-sessional intergovernmental meetings (IIMs) to examine proposals for a WIPO Development Agenda. Three such meetings were held in 2005. At the Thirty-Second Session of the WIPO General Assembly in October 2005 WIPO’s Member States agreed to "accelerate and complete" the IIM discussions by convening two meetings of a Provisional Committee on Proposals Related to a WIPO Development Agenda (PCDA) in 2006. Excerpted from "Policy Brief on Intellectual Property, Development and Human Rights: How Human Rights can support proposals for a World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Development Agenda, 3D Publications Versión en español print    send   correct  ADD YOUR COMMENT >>  Proposal for a Development Agenda  Access to Knowledge (A2K)  Meetings and follow-up  WIPO General Assembly  Other international agreements   News Up-to-date current affairs information. Thu Jul 13 2006 Developing countries present TRIPS amendment proposal Fuente: IP Watch Thu Jul 06 2006 WIPO: Differences re-emerge on development proposals Fuente: Third World Network Fri May 26 2006 iCommons Summit 2006: "Towards a global digital commons" In-depth reports Detailed reports on key issues UN reform More than 60 years after its founding, the United Nations should rebuild its credibility and relevance before the 21st century world. Software: Patents and copyrights Promoted by large corporations, software patents slow down development in the South. World Summit on the Information Society - WSIS An opportunity to build an equitable information society. World Trade Organization - WTO Trade at the service of people, or people subjected to trade? The WTO makes the difference. Patents and medicines What about equal opportunities for developed and developing countries to obtain medicines their populations need? NGOs NGO web sites Third World Network (TWN) International network of organizations and individuals involved in issues relating to development, the Third World and North-South issues.      Proposal for a Development Agenda Member states agree to further examine proposal on development Source: WIPO The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) General Assembly agreed on Monday, October 4, 2004, to further examine a proposal by a group of developing countries to integrate in a more systematic manner the development dimension in all of WIPO’s work. Member states are expected to formally adopt this decision in a plenary meeting of the General Assembly on Tuesday, October 5, 2004. Massive victory at WIPO! Source: BoingBoing At the general session of the WIPO in Geneva , the Assembly as adopted a decision to put development and the promotion of creativity front-and-center in its goals. Establishing a "Development Agenda" for the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Source: GRAIN Proposal submitted by Argentina, Bolivia and Brazil to the 40th Series of Meetings of the Assemblies of the Member States of WIPO and to the 31st Session of the WIPO General Assembly, Geneva, 27 September-5 October 2004. Geneva Declaration on the Future of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Source: CPTech Campaign aimed at collecting signatures to change the mission and work program for WIPO. NGOs, scientists and academics call for major reform of intellectual property system Source: TWN Martin Khor The system of patents, copyright and other intellectual property rights are coming under public attack, including from famous scientists and well known law professors, who say that this system has gone too far in benefiting a few people at the expense of the majority. Report by Martin Khor (TWN) of the Seminar on the Future of WIPO (held in Geneva 13-14 September 2004). NGOs launch declaration and support a development agenda in WIPO Source: TWN Kanaga Raja Several civil society organizations gathered in Geneva for the annual General Assemblies of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) have welcomed and supported a proposal put forth by Argentina and Brazil calling for the establishment of a "Development Agenda'. Report by Kanaga Raja, published in the SUNS (South-North Development Monitor), Geneva, 30 September 2004. NGO statement supporting the establishment of a development agenda for the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIP Source: TWN According to this statement, the proposal to establish a development agenda for WIPO crystallizes many of the concerns previously raised by developing countries as well as by many NGOs around the world and reaffirms the urgent need for WIPO to undertake a focused and exhaustive discussion to include the development dimension in its programs and activities. Towards a "World Intellectual Wealth Organisation" Free Software Foundation Several organizations and individuals from the free software movement have written a short declaration which endorses the Geneva Declaration, but which also calls on WIPO to be replaced with a World Intellectual Wealth Organization." They invite others to sign. 'WIPO must respect international human rights treaties' Source: 3D THREE Statement made by 3D -> Trade – Human Rights – Equitable Economy to the third session of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Inter-sessional Intergovernmental Meeting on a Development Agenda for WIPO, 20-22 July 2005. It highlights the need for WIPO norm-setting and intellectual property policy to be pro-development, human rights-consistent and coherent with the development and human rights objectives of other United Nations special agencies. July 2005. Intellectual property and the WIPO "Development Agenda" Source: WSIS Papers Sangeeta Shashikant The intellectual property (IP) regime provides the legal means to appropriate knowledge. These are rights granted by society to individuals or organizations for their creative works, preventing others from making unauthorized use for a limited period of time. However with the recent advances in biotechnology and information and communication technology, multinational companies in developed countries are seeking to control the global knowledge economy through the use of strong IP protection and enforcement. A review of the international IP framework needs to be undertaken to understand the development implications, costs and benefits of existing policies to identify their imbalances. Future standard setting and harmonization exercises should only be undertaken after sufficient evaluation and understanding of the implications of such an exercise. The "Development Agenda", proposed at the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), provides an opportunity to begin a reform process. This paper examines this initiative and argues that the "Development Agenda" should be pursued tenaciously by developing countries. Towards a digital agenda for developing countries Source: South Centre Dalindyebo Shabalala This research paper analyses the implications of digital and Internet content policy for access to knowledge in developing countries and makes some initial recommendations. The paper recommends that the emerging digital content presents tremendous opportunities and the chance for developing countries to shape and implement development oriented copyright regimes. The paper also warns of extending protecting regimes which would only serve to benefit major rights-holder industries and would be of little or no benefit to developing countries. August 2007    Access to Knowledge (A2K) Offsetting IPRs' adverse effects on access to knowledge Source: SUNS Martin Khor The public's access to knowledge is increasingly hindered by imbalanced intellectual property regimes that are tilted to the advantage of IP holders vis-a-vis users and consumers, and there is a need to establish a treaty or at least principles to redress this imbalance as part of a "development agenda" in fora dealing with intellectual property protection. Proposals for reforming intellectual property regimes Source: Choike Martin Khor A meeting on intellectual property and access to knowledge held in Geneva on 3-4 February has reviewed several proposals for restricting the scope of copyright and patents in favour of consumers and the public interest, and for promoting greater public access to information and knowledge. Feb 2005 Who Owns the Knowledge Economy? Source: The Corner House TRIPS -- the World Trade Organisation's agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights -- was the most important agreement on intellectual property of the 20th century. It revolutionised the way that property rights in information were defined and enforced. TRIPS effectively globalises the set of intellectual property principles it contains, because most countries are members of, or are seeking membership of, the World Trade Organisation that administers TRIPS. This briefing paper explores the background to TRIPS and the corporate political organising that orchestrated and paved the way for the agreement. Published September 2004. Why should intellectual property rights matter to civil society? Source: APC Africa ICT Policy Monitor Article focusing on the harmful rol that inflexible intellectual property rights play on development processes and democratisation of knowledge. It also states some positions that civil society organizations should adopt respect to them. August, 2005. Intellectual-Property rights and wrongs Source: Incommunicado Joseph Stiglitz "Hopefully, in WIPO’s reconsideration of intellectual property regimes, the voices of the developing world will be heard more clearly than it was in the WTO negotiations; hopefully, WIPO will succeed in outlining what a pro-developing intellectual property regime implies; and hopefully, WTO will listen: the aim of trade liberalization is to boost development, not hinder it" states the Nobel laureate in economics Joseph Stiglitz in this article on intellectual property regimes. August 2005. Risks and opportunities for access to knowledge Source: WSIS Papers James Love The development of the Internet and other information technologies (IT) has lead to a dramatic increase in the importance of knowledge goods and services, in the realms of terms of economic, political, cultural and personal life. None of these developments are taking place in a social or political vacuum. Commercial interests are organized to influence governments and global intergovernmental bodies and the broader public is increasingly being empowered by the new IT to play a more important role in such policy discussions. There are many proposed and adopted measures to vastly increase the degree to which knowledge can be owned and controlled, as there also are many proposals, initiatives and experiments to expand access to knowledge. Some of the proposals and initiatives involve intellectual property rights, while others involve policies that would support or undermine new methods of collaboration or new business models for creating and disseminating knowledge goods. Developing countries oppose to include "webcasting" in broadcast treaty Source: Third World Network Sangeeta Shashikant The issue of whether the scope of the proposed treaty on the protection of broadcasting organizations should include "webcasting" (transmission over the web) has dominated much of the discussion so far in the 14th Session of the Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights (SCCR). Cultura Livre The Cultura Livre project seeks to establish a dialogue between countries of the South about the issues surrounding Culture, Media, and Intellectual Property. Its objective is to generate and put into practice instruments for the promotion of development, access to education, knowledge, and democratization of information. The threat of technological protection measures to a development oriented information society Source: South Centre New international legal requirements for the protection of technological measures used by copyright owners to control access and use of their works can hinder the ability of developing countries to promote access to knowledge for development. This policy brief explains the current international legal framework for protection of copyright and national experiences in the implementation of these laws. It highlights that developing countries should use the flexibilities available to narrowly implement anti-circumvention obligations in such a way that can reduce the threat they pose on access to knowledge. August 2007. Push for open access to research Source: BBC News Service In this article, Michael Geist, who is an Internet law professor, analyses the changes in the dissemination of research information to the general public. In the current model, researchers in government funded projects publish their findings in research journals which can be accessed only by purchasing them. However, a new stand has been taken based on the open access principle which argues that results from research funded by taxpayer money should be available free of cost. The author explains the primary drivers of this initiative and also the barriers that must be overcome to make this a success. february 2007. Brazilian copyright law and how it restricts the efficiency of the human right to education Source: Sur International Journal on Human Rights Sergio Branco This paper proposes to illustrate how the current copyright structure in Brazil and the improper use of technology poses a serious threat to the implementation of the human right to education - which, in its broadest sense, also embraces other human rights. December 2007.    Meetings and follow-up US draft paper counters Development Agenda in WIPO Source: Third World Network The US has informally circulated a draft paper containing its views and proposals for the meeting in WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organisation) on a Development Agenda scheduled for 11-13 April. The paper clearly ignores and sidesteps the demands of the proponents of a "development agenda" in WIPO. WIPO Manifesto for Transparency, Participation, Balance and Access Activists and organizations call for an immediate participation of civil society and consumer-interest non-governmental organizations (NGOs) within WIPO's activities. Specifically, but not limited, in the Inter-sessional Intergovernmental Metting (11-13 April 2005) and the Permanent Committee on Cooperation for Civil society calls for participation at the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)'s activities. This participation would provide a balanced discussion on WIPO's Development Agenda and on the IP system in general, observing an equilibrium between IP right holders and consumers. They also urge that WIPO plays its role in making access to knowledge feasible for humanity, bearing in mind different needs and stages of development. WIPO Development Agenda: developing countries submit new proposals Source: Intellectual Property Watch Carolyn Deere On the eve of high-level meetings on development and intellectual property, the fourteen co-sponsors of the proposal for the World Intellectual Property Organisation's new Development Agenda submitted detailed elaborations of their proposals for incorporating development into WIPO's work. (6th April 2006). Southern countries elaborate on WIPO development agenda Martin Khor, Sangeeta Shashikant At the inter-sesional intergovernmental meeting (IMM) on a Development Agenda for WIPO (11-13 April 2005, Geneva) Brazil and Argentina, which coordinate the 14-member Group of Friends of Development (FOD), made extensive comments on the proposals of the United States, United Kingdom and Mexico. Another highlight was a presentation by India, another major proponent of the Development Agenda. Several other developing countries also spoke in support of the FOD proposals. North-South differences emerge in WIPO development meeting Source: Third World Network Martin Khor and Sangeeta Shashikant The inter-sessional intergovernmental meeting (IIM) on a Development Agenda (DA) for WIPO (Geneva, 11-13 April 2005) was mandated by the WIPO General Assembly in October 2004 as a result of an initiative for a DA launched by the 14 members of the Group of Friends of Development (FOD). Disagreement between Northern and Southern countries soon emerged as the proposal of developing countries claimed for the incorporation of a development dimension into the organization's work and activities that would integrate developing countries main concerns. April 2005. WIPO's development meeting decides for two additional meetings Source: Mediatrademonitor The final day of the WIPO's development meeting ended with victory of the group of friends of development positions. The final document provided two more meetings, one in June 20 to 22 and another one in July in a date yet to be defined, as well as allowing NGOs accredited on a ad hoc basis to participate also in these next two meetings. WIPO to hold two more Development Agenda meetings Source: Third World Network Martin Khor The World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO) will hold two more meetings to further discuss proposals for a Development Agenda for WIPO and prepare a report to the General Assembly on future work on this issue. This was the main decision made at the end of the first inter-sessional intergovernmental meeting (IIM) on a Development Agenda for WIPO, held in Geneva on 11-13 April 2005. WIPO seminar debates intellectual property and development Source: Third World NetworK An international seminar on Intellectual Property and Development held at WIPO on 2-3 May discussed the theme "intellectual property and public policy", with sessions on public health, biodiversity and traditional knowledge, copyright and competition policy. The holding of the seminar was part of the activities of the Development Agenda for WIPO. May 2005 WIPO: Separate treatment for traditional broadcasting and webcasting Source: Third World Network Sangeeta Shashikant The issue of whether the scope of the proposed treaty on the protection of broadcasting organizations should include "webcasting" (transmission over the web) has dominated much of the discussion in the 14th Session of the Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights (SCCR), held on 1-5 May in Geneva. The separation of treatment of the issues was decided on after overwhelming opposition from developing countries. The US was the main advocate of including webcasting, while the EU proposed the inclusion of simulcasting (internet transmission of a traditional broadcast). May 2006 WIPO: NGOs discuss the new development agenda Source: Electronic Frontier Foundation Gwen Hinze The first meeting of the new WIPO Committee on Development and Intellectual Property was held during the first week of March 2008 to formulate a work plan to put development in the mainstream focus of WIPO's operations and activities. April 2008.    WIPO General Assembly The General Assembly of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) meets in Geneva from 26 September until 5 October 2005 to examine several key issues. Preview of WIPO General Assembly Source: Third World Network Martin Khor The World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO) has begun its 2005 General Assembly on Monday 26 September. It will be an important Assembly, as there are many controversial decisions to be made: (1) Decide on the future process and the shape of the Development Agenda initiatve of the developing countries; (2) Decide on the future of the negotiations in the Patent Committee for a substantive patent law treaty (SPLT); (3) Decide on whether to convene a Diplomatic Conference on a new Broadcasting Treaty which will give new rights to broadcasting organisations. WIPO creates 'Provisional Committee' for Development Agenda Source: Third World Network Sangeeta Shashikant Agreement was reached on two issues that have preoccupied and divided the WIPO General Assembly (Geneve, 26 September to 5 October): how to take the Development Agenda Initiative forward and the future work plan on the Draft Substantive Patent Law Treaty (SPLT). On the Development Agenda, members agreed to establish a "provisional committee" to take forward the process of the Intergovernmental Inter-sessional Meetings (IIM) and report back to the 2006 General Assembly. October 2005. Consumer Project on Technology (CPtech) web page Source: CPTech Presents a collection of news stories and NGO documents as well as documents prepared by CPtech for the meeting. Intellectual Property Watch coverage Source: IP Watch IP Watch published several articles of its own about the General Assembly discussions. IP Justice Webpage on WIPO 2005 General Assembly Meeting Source: IP Justice Articles and reports by IP Justice and other organizations.    Other international agreements Intellectual property, development and human rights Source: 3D The purpose of this Policy Brief is to encourage advocates, policy-makers and WIPO Member States to continue high-level discussions on a WIPO Development Agenda and elaborate an actionable, pro-development agenda that is consistent with the development commitments and human rights obligations of WIPO Member States. PDF format.

Choike is a project of the Third World Institute supported by Hivos www.choike.org | Contact | Phone / Fax: +598 (2) 412-4224 | Dr. Juan Paullier 977, Montevideo URUGUAY