IMF and WB long-term development strategies
Source: allAfrica
The cut in government expenditure in education, health, and housing amongst others, ends up harming the welfare of the people. March, 2007 [see more]
 
Imprimir   Enviar    Correct 
YOUR COMMENT >>

Long-term development programmes were originally the domain of the World Bank (WB) alone. However, when short-term lending became more and more unnecessary, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) sought for a new mission. In co-operation with the WB, the IMF established programmes aimed at providing medium- and long-term support for developing countries. By providing structural adjustment, the IMF began operating in a terrain which is supposedly the domain of the WB.

Initially, the IMF was created to provide short-term macroeconomic management, while the Bank was responsible for long-term administration of microeconomic projects. However, the Bank also departed from its original project-oriented lending to a broader programme approach. The distinction between the institutions thus became increasingly blurred. The traditional distinction between macro- and microeconomics in facilitating growth was challenged. It was acknowledged that growth-oriented stabilization can only take place over a long period of time. Therefore, Bank and Fund now co-operate in long-term development.

The so-called Structural Adjustment Programmes (SAPs) are targeted at low-income developing countries, mainly in Africa, South Asia, and the Caribbean. Support is made available to eligible countries undertaking comprehensive macroeconomic and structural adjustment programmes. Central to the arrangements are policy papers, which are drafted by national authorities in collaboration with the IMF and WB staff. These identify the country's macroeconomic and structural policy objectives, the strategies and priorities of the authorities to achieve those objectives, and the associated external financing requirements, thereby serving as a framework for other donors planning additional technical and financial assistance. According to many NGOs, SAPs are the main instrument used by the Bretton Woods Institutions to impose neo-liberal policies on developing countries, thereby increasing poverty and environmental destruction instead of generating the promised economic growth. In the 1990s worldwide concerns about SAPs grew to unprecedented levels. In response, the IMF and WB renamed and redesigned the programmes several times. They incorporated elements of poverty reduction and environmental sustainability into the programmes. However, the main focus remained on facilitating economic growth by applying a framework of neo-liberal economic policy prescriptions agreed upon in the “Washington Consensus”. This section provides an overview of the IMF's and WB's current long-term development programmes. For more information on NGO views on IMF performance see also IMF reform.




Imprimir print   Enviar send   correct 
ADD YOUR COMMENT >>

 
In-depth reports
Detailed reports on key issues
World Bank
The World Bank's main self-proclaimed objective is to eradicate poverty. Yet, evidence suggests that its programmes often harm the poor and the environment.
International Monetary Fund - IMF
The IMF is one of the most powerful international organizations. Its policies change the lives of millions of people in developing countries.
 

The Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP)

PRSP: Are the World Bank and IMF delivering on promises? (CIDSE/Caritas Internationalis)

Poverty reduction strategies and PRSPs (World Bank)

Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers - Operational Issues (IMF)

The Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSP) (IMF)

An Independent Guide to PRSP (Eurodad)

Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs): A rough guide (Bretton Woods Project)

Influencing Poverty Reduction Strategies: A guide (Oxfam)

The end of imagination: The World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and poverty reduction (Focus on the Global South)

Synopsis of external comments and contributions on the joint IMF/World Bank staff review on the PRSP approach (IMF)

Jubilee South Pan-African declaration on PRSPs (Southern African People’s Solidarity Network)

Civil society participation in the PRSP process (Afrodad)

Report of the International Conference on Poverty Reduction Strategy in Africa (Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung: Dialogue on Globalization)

The myths and dangers of PRSPs (Bretton Woods Project)

From ‘donorship’ to ownership? Moving towards PRSP round two (Oxfam)

The Poverty Reduction Growth Facility (PRGF)

The Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility (PRGF). A factsheet. (IMF)

IMF Executive Board Reviews the Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility (PRGF) (IMF)

PRGF: A blind alley (Centro de Estudios para el Desarrollo Lavarlo y Agrarios)

Eurodad 2003 Research Programme: Is the IMF pro-poor

The trap of the Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility (Centro de Estudios Internacionales)

The Heavily Indebted Poor Country (HIPC) Initiative

Hypocrisy that underlies HIPC (Guardian Unlimited)

Debt Relief for Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (World Bank)

Debt Relief under the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) Initiative (IMF)

What is the HIPC Initiative? (Jubilee Research)

G-24 Secretariat Briefing Paper on the HIPC Initiative (G-24)

A Joint Submission to the World Bank and IMF Review of HIPC and Debt Sustainability (CAFOD)

Why civil society must reject HIPC (Coalition for Global Solidarity and Social Development)

Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) Initiative – Status of implementation (IMF)

Contradictions discredit Fund-Bank HIPC schemes (Third World Network)

Real progress report on HIPC (Jubilee Research)

The Structural Adjustment Programme Review Initiative (SAPRI)

The policy roots of economic crisis and poverty

Adjustment from within: Lessons from the Structural Adjustment Program Review Initiative (World Bank)

The policy roots of economic crisis and poverty: A multi country participatory assessment of structural adjustment (Structural Adjustment Program Review International Network)

The World Bank’s one–way dialogue (Structural Adjustment Program Review International Network)

Do IMF and World Bank policies help the poor?

The elusive quest for 'fiscal space' (Bretton Woods Project)

Africa: IMF, World Bank are a major cause of poverty (allAfrica)

Sell the gold, free the poor (Foreign policy in focus)

The debt and the future of Africa (Pambazuka)

Africa’s experience with the Bretton Woods institutions (Pambazuka)

Africa, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (Pambazuka Newsletter)

Indigenous Peoples Organisations’ letter to the World Bank (Forest Peoples)

World Bank still says yes to oil, gas projects (IPS)

World Bank misses historic opportunity (Friends of the Earth International)

Growing doubts about neoliberalism (Third World Network Features)

Growth is good for the poor (World Bank)

Growth may be good for the poor – but are IMF and World Bank policies good for growth? (Center for Economic and Policy Research)

Do the new World Bank and IMF loans support countries’ poverty reduction strategies? (Bretton Woods Project)

The IMF and World Bank’s cosmetic makeover (Dollars&Sense)

Leading a horse to water: Is there a role for the IMF in poverty reduction? (Bretton Woods Project)


Choike is a project of the Third World Institute supported by Hivos and the Mott Foundation
www.choike.org | Contact | Phone / Fax: +598 (2) 902-0490 | 18 de julio 1077/903, Montevideo URUGUAY